Bernardinai raso, kad Lietuvius vilioja kas? -O gi 1940-1990 Lietuvos okupantas rusija, benzino priedanga
Stai:

http://www.bernardinai.lt/index.php?object=BernardinaiArticles.BernardinaiArticles&action=showComments&id=97630


Kokia slyksti antaste:
-Lietuvius vilioja Liliputin.

Smerkiu komunistinio Lubio organo rasliava, nes ji turi uzslepta ir pavojinga tiksla:

-Lietuvos rusifikacija. Ten kalbesites ne angliskai, vokiskai o 1940-1990 m rusu okupantu primesta burlioku kalba, kuri zmogu uzmusa ir stabdo Vakaru gyvensenos atejima.

- Ekonominis sabotazas, Lietuvai sunkiais laikais,
- atseit isvezkite pinigus is Lietuvos atiduokit juos rusams,
O as siulau juos isleisti Lietuvoje, tik ne Lukoil kuro koloneleje).

-LT zmoniu pavertimas antipatriotais: atseit parsiduok rusams uz benzina/dujas,

-Schengen erdves istrynimas, kvailas, bet savanorinis vertimasis i homosovietikus, nutolimas nuo EU, NATO, Amerikos.

-Lietuvos iklampinima i rusu okupuota Karaliaciu
- ar tai "pigiais degalais, vodka ar ZIV/AIDS uzkrestom prostitutemis, kuriu yra 20 tukstanciu ir dar daugiau narkomanu,

-*** Karaliauciaus 1945-2009 rusu okupacijos iteisinimas,
- nes nesako, kad "vaziuoju i rusija benzino" o sako:
- vaziuoju i kaliningrada,.. tarsi jis butu nepriklausoma valstybe o ne gudrai uzmaskuotas ir prie rusijos priklijuotas gabalas.

Prasau, pazvelkite is atstumo i Lietuvos ivykius, kaip i pasaulio ivykiu visumos dali, Kremlin kgb chuntos revansizmo fone:

1.Kremlin nori tureti itakos zona, t/.y. vel okupuoti Baltjos valstybes,
-t.y. tiesiogini priejima prie Lenkijos, nes "trukdo" kordoriui" i Vokietija
-ir pakartoti 1939 m rugsejo menesi- is abieju pusiu apsupti ir pasmaugti

-kremlin nori *** musu rankomis *** issprogdinti i ir Europos Sajunga ir NATO ir Schengen erdve, nes i juos rusai niekuomt neisibraus.

-padaznejes visokiu "lengvatiniu vizu" prasytoju antpludis,
-padaznejes surusejusiu, angliskai nekalbanciu "Lytvos teatralu, pevcoru, tancoru" trynimasi okupuotame karaliauciasu zemeje.
Kodel?

O kur jiems isreiksti savo "1980 metu rusiska gudruma", jei Europai ju nereikia?

-Tik pas zemesnio issivystimo individus. O "aktior ir akrysos" vel pasijaus "reikalingais ir siuolaikinais", dargi jiems plos o ne apmetys su batais...

Smerkiant BNS/ELTA/lubio organa "lietuvos ziniu" pavadinimu,- pasmerkite ir ju dali Bernardnus:

-ar supratote, kad angeliuku sparneliais, kryzeliais, sventuju abrozeliais uzsimaskaves Bernardinai, mus apkvailina ir veda i Moskva, sovietsk o ne i Roju.

Kas uztvos su 1 m ilgio Kryziumi Redaktoriui per sonus ir is jo isvarys Velnia?!

yra keisti. Įstojo į NVS, kuriai vadovauja Rusija, ir tuo pat metu iškėlė sau uždavinius įstoti į NATO. Kokio velnio su Rusija reikėjo trintis po Sovietų Sąjungos žlugimo?

O Adamkus taip stengėsi... :) Dėl Gruzijos stengėsi labiau nei dėl Lietuvos, bet šnipštas gavosi... :)

Gaila tikrai draugiška Lietuvai šalis ,bet Vokietijos dėka pasmerkta patekti atgal pas rusų meškiną į glėbį.Tai tas pats kaip esant reikalui NATO mus gins.Rusija valdo ir kariuomene per Kastrubinus ir kitus panašius socdemus čia Lietuvoje.Valstybininkai viska sutvarko nors fasadas konservatoriškas ,bet valdo socdemai . Realia visi jie[konservai] smulkus dovanėliu ėmėjai ,lyginant su socdemų pinigais.

Gaila tikrai draugiška Lietuvai šalis ,bet Vokietijos dėka pasmerkta patekti atgal pas rusų meškiną į glėbį.Tai tas pats kaip esant reikalui NATO mus gins.Rusija valdo ir kariuomene per Kastrubinus ir kitus panašius socdemus čia Lietuvoje.Valstybininkai viska sutvarko nors fasadas konservatoriškas ,bet valdo socdemai . Realia visi jie[konservai] smulkus dovanėliu ėmėjai ,lyginant su socdemų pinigais.

del straipsnio :
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124804183713363327.html

*Georgia's President Vows Changes
Gruzijos Prezidentas vykdys reformas.

BNS/ELTA antraste yra nusikalstamai neteisinga. (atseit, laidoja naryste NATO, ir kas sukele didziuli dziaugsma BNS/ELTA'i)..

Jei BNS/ELTA remiasi WSJ, tai neprivalejo NEkeisti o palikti originala atraste.



BNS/ELTA staigus veiksmai, tuoj pat paciupta The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) straipsnis, byloja tai, kad sis "interviu" yra naudingas Kremlin rezimui, t.y ir BNS/ELTA, atseit:
- stai kokia galinga kruvina kgbist meska, net Gruzija gali pasmaugti, o jei nesugebejo pasmaugti -tai bent i NATO uzkirto kelia....

O as manau kitaip:
-Saakasvili kalboje galejo samoningai iterpti zodziai, kad nuraminus Kremlin teroristus ir jo tarna W Steimeier..

Zinant, ka Amerika ir Gruzija (Ukraina irgi) turi susitarimus su Amerika del karinio bendradarbiavimo (ekvivalento Narystes pasiruosimo Planui)


Gruzijos Prezidentas Mikheil Saakashvili yra prisieke Gruzijos permainoms ir jas igyvendins,- tai ne kremlin reikalas!
-iki M. Saakashvili kadencijos dar daug metu,
-kremlin rezimas ispaustas i kampa ir jis anksciau ar veliau bus isspirtas is Gruzijos,
-USA Vice president Joseph Biden [baiden] galejo irgi siaipsau "apvaliai" pasakyti...
-o be to WSJ nera USA President atstovas spaudai,
-jei i BBC rusai "prakisha" anti Gruziniska rasliava, kuria po to skuba skelbti, zinoma -su BBC etikete, tai kodel to negali - WSJ? Gali buti. bent pavieniai atvejai.

Kodel taip sakau?
Todel, kas sio "interview" dvasia , yra "kitoka", nei iprasta.

Neziurint Kremlin, provokaciju, kisimosi per rusu 5 kolona ir "opozicija", M Saakashvili populiarumas isaugo 43 %.

Todel......linkiu Gruzijai testi reformas, stiprinti rysius su Vakarais, isijungti i NATO ir atgauti teritorini vientisuma (ar vientisuma ir NATO po to).

Siulau minima straipsni ir kai kuriuos skaitytoju komentarus.

Atkreipkite demesi, kad kremlin rezimo "pissarnia" ir ten pasiunte du oro gadintojus, kurie bruka Kremlin versija..

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124804183713363327.html

Georgia's President Vows Changes
TBILISI, Georgia -- Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili is expected to unveil Monday moves to share more power and make elections more democratic in an attempt to mollify his critics and begin a comeback.
The address, before the country's parliament just days before a morale-boosting visit from U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, follows three months of street protests by the president's political opponents, who continue to demand his resignation after losing a disastrous war against Russia last summer. His critics accuse him of increasing authoritarianism, of monopolizing the state media for his own ends and of using the police to repress protesters.
In the speech, parts of which have been reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, Mr. Saakashvili pledges to set new local elections, to promise bigger media space for his adversaries and to offer the opposition seats on some decision-making bodies inside government.


The president said in the interview that after a "psychological turnaround" he realized his task was to modernize Georgia. He said his plan was to deepen democracy and ensure a peaceful transition of power when he steps down in 2013.
He also called the hopes of Georgia joining NATO "almost dead."

It's tragic," he said. "It means the Russians fought for the right reasons."
Before the August war, Mr. Saakashvili spoke confidently of his country's accession to NATO and the European Union, and its imminent reunification with the two breakaway regions -- South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Now, the president says achieving all three goals seems unlikely any time soon.
Adversaries remain skeptical of the move. "It's all blah, blah, blah," said opposition leader Levan Gachechiladze, before he knew the details of the speech. "He has promised things before and there have been no results."
In the interview, Mr. Saakashvili denied the timing of his speech was linked to Vice President Biden's two-day visit, which starts on Wednesday, saying it was driven by domestic concerns.
"It's the right moment," he said. "The radical opposition is confused."
Vice President Biden will this week visit Georgia and Ukraine amid rising anxiety in both countries about what Washington's "reset" of relations with Russia means for the Kremlin's pro-Western neighbors. Aides say Mr. Saakashvili is keen to extract commitments from the U.S. in political, military and economic affairs after a period last fall when he felt "abandoned" by Western allies, including Washington...... continued.....

Vincent

"Adversaries remain skeptical of the move. "It's all blah, blah, blah," said opposition leader Levan Gachechiladze, before he knew the details of the speech.

"He has promised things before and there have been no results." "

I agree. Anybody can talk; look at Joe Biden. Let's watch for results.
-----------------------------------
James [dzeims]

As a person who has visited Georgia many times, I feel ashamed that the US and EU give so little support to this democracy.

I have seen with my own eyes how Georgia turned around under Saakashvili. He did HUGE work to destroy the corruption and HE DID.

He created a working (Us like Police force) He destroyed crime rings and criminals that ruled the country and made Georgia’s economy free and rapidly developing and if not Mr. Putins barbaric acts Georgia would have soon turned into a Regions Dubai.

I do not understand WHY did the Bush administration set Saakashvili up.

Putin stated very openly:
“If the western countries recognize Kosovo, we will take asymmetric actions including a military component.”

At the same time a HUGE Russian military force was gathering at the Georgians border… (WHY did we not stop Russians???)

EVERYBODY knew this was happening and Russians where NOT hiding it, in fact this was widely displayed in Russian propaganda channels like (ORT, RTR, NTV and Kremlins propaganda men like M.Leontiev; Pushkov; G.Pavlovski; A.Markov)

And THEY SAID WHAT THEY WILL DO. There was no reaction from the west…

WE SET HIM UP, instead of helping Saakashvili. And I don’t understand why.

Kosovo was in fact the opposite of what happened to Georgia. Because Georgias where getting massivvly killed in the Georgian region Abkhazia and “South Ossetia”(Gergian region that has been renamed to that by Bolsheviks in 1922, after occupation of Georgia in 1921 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Army_invasion_of_Georgia)

Saakashvili did his best top reform the country and Georgia was in fact the N#1 economic reformer in the world, he did everything he could.

As for the oppoaition they scream fo the “authoritarism” bcause it’s the best weapon to fight Saakashvili, by calling him what he is not. Oposition in Georgia has most of the papers, radio’s, 2 TV channels under it’s total control and the rest of the media covers the opposition opinions for about 30-40 % of the news time. With around 20-30% of the time devoted to the Governmental officials. The rest is neutral news. WHAT’S NOT DEMOCRATIC?

As for Gachechiladze(the “opposition” leader) he is in connection with the Mafia and his recent meetings with the mobsters that have an asylum in Russia prove that.

We had to reboot Georgia and Ukraine by making them NATO allies asap, instead we reboot Russia. HOW CAN YOU REBOOT KGB MR.OBAMA? HOW? THEY WILL SIGN ALL THE DOCUMENTS AND WILL AKKE YOU DO THE SAME, ONLY THEY WILL NEVER DO WHAT WE ASK THEM TO DO. THIS IS A GAME, AND TRUST ME THEY ARE FAR BETTER PLAYERS IN THIS GAME IN THE KREMLIN THAN WE ARE IN WASHINGTON!

P.S.

Also I want to remind everyone that Russia has not complied with it’s commitments that where signed with president of France… why are we shaking Mr. Putins hand as if nothing has happened?

Blame Saakashvili? Why not learn Russian and start to read the facts.
-===================================================================
George [dzordz]
Stop disseminate your KGB lies here dear Mr. Bogdanov:
1. Russian military attacked and Georgia responded – everybody knows that.
2. Russian planes were bombing Tskinvali and that’s why were shot down by friendly fire;
3. “under UN mandate”???? since when Russians in South Ossetia had UN mandate? Why do you lie? It was mandate under tri-lateral agreement.
Lie,s lies, lies ….

***The saddest part is that Europe abandoned Georgia, like it abandoned Czechoslovakia and Poland after Hitler’s attacks.

Maybe that’s a reason why Germany was now in the front line of selling Georgia to Russia?

They (Germans) miss the Ribentrop-Molotov agreement.

But they did it again, Bravo Germany! Eastern European states – YOU ARE THE NEXT TO FELL RUSSIAN BOMBS ON YOU!
======================================================================
George

There are thousands of sources describing how Russians attacked first, so your passage from Russian media sources here means nothing.

Medvedev himself acknowledged that Russia was preparing for this war for long time, and Russian general Borisov acknowledged

****There are thousands of sources describing how Russians attacked first, so your passage from Russian media sources here means nothing.

Medvedev himself acknowledged that Russia was preparing for this war for long time, and Russian general Borisov acknowledged that non-authorized (NOT SO-CALLED “PEACEKEEPERS”) entered South Ossetia more than week before war and run military exercise there.

So stop disseminate disinformation here.
ed that non-authorized (NOT SO-CALLED “PEACEKEEPERS”) entered South Ossetia more than week before war and run military exercise there.

So stop disseminate disinformation here.

Nurimkit, labusai. Kirdyk tai Jūsų geriausiai draugei Gruzijai. Nebegersit daugiau boržomioJei nebūt šaudę į savus Rusija būt įvykdžius Žirinovskio siūlymą Bušui "bombanut po tbilisi". Rusija yra, buvo ir bus šio regiono valdove. Ir ne jums, turintiem 2 tankus ir tris geldas jūroj, spręst apie Rusijos galią. Žiūrėkit, paliks Jus amerikonai likimo valiai, kaip kad paliko gruzinus? Ką tada darysit? Lenkų nekenčiat, su latviais ir baltarusiais švakai bendraujant-beliks vėl kreiptis į motiną Rusiją. Ta atleis. Jau ne kartą atleido.
Rusija tebelieka pagrindinis veiksnys ir vienintelė valstybė, galinti nušluoti JAV nuo žemės paviršiaus. Rusijos invazija į Gruziją, Ukrainai ir Baltijos šalims daromas spaudimas yra labai rimti signalai. Amerikos politikos ekspertai neteigia, kad Maskvos reikia bijoti, tačiau ragina skaitytis su tuo faktu, kad Kremlius šiose valstybėse turi savų strateginių ir teisėtų interesų.Formuluotė labai jau prisitaikėliška. Jeigu Maskva daro energetinį spaudimą Baltijos šalims, tai, pasak Amerikos politikų, reiškia jos teisėtus interesus regione. Taigi nors ataskaitoje raginama tvirtai remti Baltijos valstybių nepriklausomybę, sudaromas įspūdis, kad naujasis JAV prezidentas Barackas Obama ekspertų stumiamas į padėtį, kurią jie suformulavo taip: pro medžius reikia matyti mišką. Tai reiškia, kad mažų valstybių interesai, menkos svarbos klausimai neturi užgožti esminių problemų. Atrodo, europietiška „realpolitik“ praktika persikėlė per Atlantą...

Na ką , tovariščiai litvinai, prisižaidėd su tuoSaku? Kiek jums sakiau-neieškokit priešų arti, o draugų toli-taip nebūna, tai brangiai kainuoja ir tai suformuluoja kreivų veidrodžių bkaralystės vaizdelius. Iš kurių kikene visa Europa ir ne tik...

Ir kuo Nato naudinga?Šiaip savo noru patenkame į Jav įtakos zona,bet ne savo noru galime patekti i kitų šalių įtaką ,jei Jav bus naudinga mus iškeisti į kažka kitko.

nereikia i nato tokiu aborigenu, tegu susitvarko savo salies viduje, ir Lietuva tegu dziaugiasi kad ir jos nemetas is nato kaip afrikos respublikos

JAU NEBEPADĖS IR SENELIS ADAMKAVIČIUS

Rusija valdo!